1/4/2023 0 Comments Silverfast epson v600As others in this thread have noted, you're likely to get your best results for 35mm film from these. SILVERFAST EPSON V600 MANUALAll of their under $1k scanners worth considering only scan 35mm film and use a manual feed tray. SILVERFAST EPSON V600 SOFTWAREPlustek apparently offers great technical support for its hardware, but the software supplied by SilverFast is going to leave you on your own for most things. * One-frame-at-a-time film scanners like those sold by Plustek. Here's what I've found:įilm scanners on the market are divided into three categories: Hope you enjoyed the tutorial and let me know if you have different experiences, thoughts or questions.I decided on the V600, but not without a lot of research and some frustration. Consistency in the workflow is key to the success in my opinion. We cannot compare these techniques as they are too different, but after all, you can see that it is possible to get descent results from Epson Scan with some work in Lightroom. In the end, if you compare the Epson Scan final version with the version derived from the Fuji Frontier scanner, we can clearly see a difference, but nevertheless both scans look like a real film scan. This will reduce scanner noise significantly and is very useful, not only for slide scanning but also for color negative scanning. One last benefit of Silverfast is the multi-exposure function. In Epson Scan I almost solely rely on on the auto feature as a lack of a good histogram and "Lab" readouts make precise color correction impossible. The tools available in Silverfast for color balancing are much more sophisticated to what is available in Epson Scan. The colors in the Silverfast scan look a bit different, which is probably due to some slightly variations in the color corrections by myself. I am not a scientist and I don´t want to claim anything, but decide yourself, which of the scans you prefer most: the one with the custom profile or the default Epson profile. This has nothing to do with calibrating the process from scene to final scan. But with the manufacturer variation in mind, I think it can be helpful to make a color profile for positives that ensure correct replication of the underlying linear scan before inversion. I know that a common concept says that there is no way to profile scanners for color negative film. This has improved my results dramatically. I also use a custom made scanner profile together with Epson Scans. Digital ICE increases scanning times significantly and the algorithms are not as good as in Silverfast´s iSRD technology. While Epson Scan is a good piece of software and it does not have to be purchased separately, I also lacks a certain ability to render fine details, especially when used with digital ICE. Nevertheless I want to point out some drawbacks of "Epson Scan". The whole idea of the tutorial was to provide you with a solid workflow to get good results from you Epson scanner. I have been told that these additional casts are due to a phenomena called "registration issue" and has to do with the overall precision and calibration of the scanner. However I often encounter additional color shifts after the final scan has been made. Note: If you feel this step counterintuitive you always have the option to finalize all color corrections in Epson Scan using the "Image Adjustment" panel.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |